True Cost Calculator
Raw Spreads vs. Commission Cost Matrix
Stop guessing if a "0.0 pip + Commission" account is cheaper than a "0.6 pip Zero Commission" account. See the exact math.
1.00 Lots
20
| Broker & Model | Spread Friction | Commission | Cost Per Trade | Monthly Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
🏆 Fusion Markets (ZERO)Raw ECN | -$0.00 (0 pips) | -$4.50 | -$4.50 | -$90.00 |
XM (Ultra Low)Ultra Low | -$6.00 (0.6 pips) | Zero | -$6.00 | -$120.00 |
IC Markets (Raw Spread)Raw ECN | -$1.00 (0.1 pips) | -$7.00 | -$8.00 | -$160.00 |
Capital.com (Standard)Standard | -$8.00 (0.8 pips) | Zero | -$8.00 | -$160.00 |
Pepperstone (Razor)Raw ECN | -$1.50 (0.15 pips) | -$7.00 | -$8.50 | -$170.00 |
IG Group (CFD)Standard | -$9.00 (0.9 pips) | Zero | -$9.00 | -$180.00 |
Raw Spreads vs. Zero-Commission: The Mathematical Truth
When Raw ECN Wins
Raw ECN accounts (like IC Markets Raw or Pepperstone Razor) are superior for ultra-short-term scalpers who trade 50+ times a day on major pairs during peak London/NY sessions where spreads stay tight at 0.0 to 0.1 pips.
When Ultra Low / Standard Wins
Accounts like XM Ultra Low win when trading smaller position sizes (0.01 to 0.50 lots) or holding trades across sessions. With zero commission and tight 0.6 pip spreads, you avoid the fixed dollar drag that penalizes small accounts.